-
Introduction
-
01.Tour & Design
-
02.Blacks & Whites
-
03.Color Accuracy
-
04.Motion
-
05.3D
-
06.Viewing Effects
-
07.Calibration
-
08.Connectivity
-
09.Audio & Menus
-
10.Multimedia & Internet
-
11.Power Consumption
-
12.Vs Samsung PN59D8000
-
13.Vs Panasonic TC-P55VT30
-
14.Vs Sony KDL-55HX820
-
15.Conclusion
-
16.Series Comparison
-
17.Photo Gallery
-
18.Ratings & Specs
-
19.Comments
LG 50PZ950
Previous: Page 12
Vs Samsung PN59D8000Next: Page 14
Vs Sony KDL-55HX820Vs Panasonic TC-P55VT30
Value Comparison
This is a hard choice. Each television in this comparison lacks something essential. The LG really couldn’t cut it in the color category, an almost inexcusable detriment at the price consumers are expected to pay. The Panasonic gets no brighter than 70 cd/m2, when we usually look for something at 200 or above. You will have a hard time watching this TV in any situation other than a pitch black room. For hundreds of dollars less, the LG is the better choice, but we were disappointed with both of these high-enders.
| Core Attributes Comparison | ||
|---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| LG 50PZ950 | Panasonic Viera TC-P55VT30 | |
| Size | 50 in. | 55 in. |
| General Type | Plasma | Plasma |
| Format | 1080p | 1080p |
Blacks & Whites
This Panasonic had a black level so deep it was almost unmeasurable. Conversely, its peak brightness is poor. At just under 70 cd/m2, it would be hard to watch this television with any other light sources in the same room. The LG here has a better contrast ratio, with a less impressive black level, but a peak brightness that allows for watching in medium levels of light. You will be happier with the LG for its environmental versatility, that is unless you live in a bomb shelter.
Color Accuracy
Color was a drag on the LG. All of the comparison models are high-end, and from the money they expect out of us, we expect a certain level of performance. In the color category, the Panasonic is at or above that level, with really smooth RGB curves and a set of colors that is, if not wholly accurate, slightly oversaturated in blues and reds, the way people claim to like. The LG by comparison just can’t shoot out a well-colored picture. The colors are inaccurate and the curves do not transition well. Where LG has succeeded so strongly throughout the year in color performance, they fall flat with their top-of-the-line model.
| Color Temperature Comparison | |
|---|---|
| LG 50PZ950 (Score: 8.97) | ![]() |
| Panasonic Viera TC-P55VT30 (Score: 9.68) | ![]() |
| RGB Comparison | |
|---|---|
| LG 50PZ950 (Score: 7.4) | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| Panasonic Viera TC-P55VT30 (Score: 7.83) | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Motion
The LG was such a performer in motion that it would be hard to beat with all the motion processing features in the modern world. The Panasonic was strong in this category, but what is strong compared to unyieldingly powerful?
| Motion Scores | ||
|---|---|---|
| LG 50PZ950 | Panasonic Viera TC-P55VT30 | |
| Motion Score | ||
Viewing Effects
We saw one of the widest viewing angles on the LG as we did anywhere. The Panasonic is great in this category as well, but right around 70º off center, it falls short of the LG.
| Viewing Angle Comparison | |
|---|---|
![]() |
|
| LG 50PZ950: 9.02 | Panasonic Viera TC-P55VT30: 7.94 |
Connectivity
The Panasonic has fewer analog connections, only one component and one composite, but it ads an SD card slot reader to put photos directly from a camera onto this large screen. If you are a photog, this could be just the feature you want. Otherwise, the LG has a larger breadth and great accessibility to the ports.
| Connectivity Comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG 50PZ950 | Samsung PN59D8000 | Panasonic TC-P55VT30 | Sony KDL-55HX820 | |
| HDMI | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Component | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Composite | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| S-Video | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VGA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Analog Audio In | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Digital Audio Out | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Analog Audio Out | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes (Included) | Yes (Included) | Yes (Included) |
| USB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Memory Card Types | None | None | SD/SDHC/SDXC | None |
| DLNA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Latest News
& Reviews
-
18-May-2012
Samsung UN46ES6500 3D LED LCD HDTV Review
This TV has the performance and picture quality to match its good looks. Samsung’s robust Smart TV platform is just icing on the cake. Read More...
-
18-May-2012
Samsung's 2012 Smart TV Platform: Explained
Samsung’s 2012 Smart TV Platform revolves primarily around the Smart Hub. The Smart Hub gathers all content the TV is capable of displaying under one roof: live TV, apps, streaming video and music, and personal media. Read More...
Top Rated HD Televisions
-
Also in this series

$2,599.001
Size: 59 in.Samsung PN59D7000
The Samsung PN59D7000 ($2,599 MSRP) is a stunning, high-end plasma TV fashioned by Samsung for 2011. It has 59 inches of great, 1080p picture quality, and as a second-generation plasma, it handles 3D reasonably well. Read full review
$2,599.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -
Also in this series

$1,299.002
Size: 51 in.Samsung PN51D6500
The Samsung PN51D6500 is one of the best deals for a big screen plasma TV. The performance is strong in most regards and the weakness are endemic to plasma TVs, not with this model in particular. Read full review
$1,299.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,749.993
Size: 47 in.LG 47LM6700
In addition to opinion-changing 3D images, this LG has a newly improved Smart TV menu system, and a remote that makes navigating the ever-expanding sea of content less of an odyssey. . Read full review
$1,749.99All TypesLEDOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,500.004
Size: 50 in.LG 50PZ950
This 1080p plasma television with internet and 3D capabilities is purportedly the best LG has to offer in 2011. Read full review
$1,500.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,299.005
Size: 46 in.Samsung UN46D6000
Everyone wants a Smart TV, but how smart is buying the Samsung UN46D6000 for its $1299 MSRP? With its reasonably good performance in many categories and more internet features than you can shake an e-stick at, that question might be hard to answer if it weren't for this review. Read full review
$1,299.00All TypesLCDOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes
Features
-
TelevisionInfo.com 2011 Select Awards
After testing dozens of televisions this year, the staff of TVI has made its official selections for the very best televisions of 2011. Read More...
-
3D TV, Not Ready for Prime Time
If you’ve been shopping for a new TV is the last two years, you’ve probably heard a lot of hype about 3D. As with most new technologies, customers are awash in baffling terminology and misinformation. Here’s a simple guide to walk you through the basics. Read More...
-
HDTV Streaming Content Compared
Televisions aren’t just getting their content through the coax cable anymore. Just as the internet has gradually moved towards a video-rich space—YouTube, Hulu, Vimeo, etc.—those same sorts of features are creeping into your TV sets. Like it or not, those 1000+ channels of direct cable are not enough anymore. Read More...
-
Technology Preview: Haier Completely Wireless Television
Imagine a TV with no wires. You’re talking about WiFi, right? No, we mean no wires, at all. Haier, the Chinese company better known as an appliance manufacturer, is showcasing a new technology here at CES that conducts electricity wireless to the TV, as well as streaming content. The TV is pretty far from production at this point, but it’s among the more amazing things we’ve seen at the show. Here’s an in-depth look at the technology and how it might be implemented in future products. Read More...










(add your own)