or Browse:
Type
Brand
Price
Need
Browse By Type Find the HDTV that fits your needs
Browse By Brand Find a HDTV from your favorite brand
Browse by Price Choose a max price using the slider below
Max Price
Any

$350.00

Any Price
Advertisement

Memorex MLT3221

Television Review

Previous: Page 13

Vs Sony KDL 32L5000

Next: Page 15

Conclusion
Memorex MLT3221
Page 14

Dynex DX-L32-10A Summary



• Dynex has a deeper black and higher overall contrast ratio.
• Memorex has a much steadier color temperature.
• Dynex is less expensive than the Memorex.

Value Comparison Summary

This match-up comes down to which you value more: color performance or contrast. The Dynex bests the Memorex at the latter, but fails at the former. Of course, the Memorex is also a bit more expensive than the Dynex.

  Comparison Specifications
 
  Memorex MLT3221 Dynex DX-L32-10A
Size 32 inches 32 inches
Price $599.99 $380
Type LCD LCD
Format 720p 720p


Blacks & Whites

The Dynex had a much deeper black level, but wasn't as bright. It did manage a higher contrast ratio than the Memorex, but not by a particularly wide margin.

Blacks & Whites Comparison Chart
Memorex MLT3221 Score:
Black Level: 5.41
Peak Brightness: 9.99
Contrast: 6.66
Dynex DX-L32-10A Score:
Black Level: 7.79
Peak Brightness: 7.05
Contrast: 7.12

Color Accuracy

The Dynex's color temperature was a train wreck and its RGB representation wasn't as accurate as the Memorex's.

Color Temperature Comparison
Memorex MLT3221 Score: 7.23
Dynex DX-L32-10A Score: 2.59
RGB Comparison


Memorex MLT3221 Score: 7.98


Dynex DX-L32-10A Score: 5.68
Color Gamut Comparison
Memorex MLT3221 Score: 4.42
Dynex DX-L32-10A Score: 4.05

Motion

Neither TV managed to have smooth motion. The Dynex had a bit less artifacting than the Memorex.

  Motion Scores
  Memorex MLT3221 Dynex DX-L32-10A
Motion Smoothness 6.00 5.50
Motion Artifacting 4.50 6.25

Viewing Effects

The Memorex had a wider viewing angle than the Dynex.

Viewing Angle Comparison
Memorex MLT3221 Score: 5.11 Dynex DX-L32-10A Score: 3.40

Connectivity

The Dynex has an extra HDMI and composite video input. The Memorex has two extra analog audio inputs and an extra analog audio output.

  Connectivity Comparison
  Memorex MLT3221 Dynex DX-L32-10A
HDMI 2 3
Component 2 2
Composite 1 2
S-Video 1 1
VGA 1 1
Analog Audio In 6 4
Digital Audio Out 1 1
Analog Audio Out 1 0

Shop for the Memorex MLT3221

Loading Recently Viewed Products
Advertisement

Latest News
& Reviews

Top Rated HD Televisions

Features

  • TelevisionInfo.com 2011 Select Awards

    After testing dozens of televisions this year, the staff of TVI has made its official selections for the very best televisions of 2011. Read More...

  • 3D TV, Not Ready for Prime Time

    If you’ve been shopping for a new TV is the last two years, you’ve probably heard a lot of hype about 3D. As with most new technologies, customers are awash in baffling terminology and misinformation. Here’s a simple guide to walk you through the basics. Read More...

  • HDTV Streaming Content Compared

    Televisions aren’t just getting their content through the coax cable anymore. Just as the internet has gradually moved towards a video-rich space—YouTube, Hulu, Vimeo, etc.—those same sorts of features are creeping into your TV sets. Like it or not, those 1000+ channels of direct cable are not enough anymore. Read More...

  • Technology Preview: Haier Completely Wireless Television

    Imagine a TV with no wires. You’re talking about WiFi, right? No, we mean no wires, at all. Haier, the Chinese company better known as an appliance manufacturer, is showcasing a new technology here at CES that conducts electricity wireless to the TV, as well as streaming content. The TV is pretty far from production at this point, but it’s among the more amazing things we’ve seen at the show. Here’s an in-depth look at the technology and how it might be implemented in future products. Read More...

Shop for the Memorex MLT3221

Advertisement
Memorex MLT3221
Television Review

Previous: Page 13

Vs Sony KDL 32L5000

Previous: Page 15

Conclusion