-
Introduction
-
01.Tour & Design
-
02.Blacks & Whites
-
03.Color Accuracy
-
04.Motion
-
05.3D
-
06.Viewing Effects
-
07.Calibration
-
08.Connectivity
-
09.Remote Control
-
10.Audio & Menus
-
11.Multimedia & Internet
-
12.Power Consumption
-
13.Vs Sony KDL 46HX800
-
14.Vs Samsung UN55C7000
-
15.Vs Panasonic TC P50VT20
-
16.Conclusion
-
17.Series Comparison
-
18.Photo Gallery
-
19.Ratings & Specs
-
20.Comments
Sony Bravia XBR-52LX900
Previous: Page 13
Vs Sony KDL 46HX800Next: Page 15
Vs Panasonic TC P50VT20Vs Samsung UN55C7000
Value Comparison
The Samsung UN55C7000 is a very attractive TV, there’s no doubt about that. It’s also cheaper than the Sony, with a larger screen to boot. But before you jump in, there’s some caveats. The Sony XBR-52LX900 includes two pairs of 3D glasses. You’ll have to buy those separately with the Samsung, at $150 per. The Sony also has built-in WiFi, while the Samsung requires yet another separate purchase of a USB dongle. The Sony also outperformed the Samsung in most tests.
The 3D performance is about the same, though tinted plastic of the Sony glasses cut down on a huge amount of brightness. Both TVs include a 2D-to-3D instant ‘upconversion,’ which is far less effective than watching native 3D content.
| Core Attributes Comparison | ||
|---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Sony Bravia XBR-52LX900 | Samsung UN55C7000 | |
| Size | 52 in. | 55 in. |
| General Type | LED | LCD |
| Format | 1080p | 1080p |
Blacks & Whites
The Samsung UN46C7000 could not match the black level of the Sony XBR-52LX900, nor could it hit the whites as bright. As a result, the Samsung’s contrast ratio was significantly narrower. We did like the Samsung when we reviewed it, but in this regard, it’s clear that the Sony was the better performer.
Color Accuracy
The Samsung UN55C7000 clearly had a harder time maintaining a consistent color temperature, judging by the charts below. However, both the Samsung and the Sony XBR-52LX900 performed well in the RGB color curve test. The Samsung’s red, green, and blue channels moved in tandem more closely, but the Sony’s were a little smoother.
| Color Temperature Comparison | |
|---|---|
| Sony Bravia XBR-52LX900 (Score: 6.21) | ![]() |
| Samsung UN55C7000 (Score: 6.39) | ![]() |
| RGB Comparison | |
|---|---|
| Sony Bravia XBR-52LX900 (Score: 8.1) | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| Samsung UN55C7000 (Score: 8.0) | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Motion
The Samsung UN55C7000 showed extremely smooth motion, but was prone to producing a lot of artifacting. Like the Sony XBR-52LX900, it has menu options to enhance smoothness, but the Sony was better able to find the balance between a smooth image and minimal artifacting.
| Motion Scores | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sony Bravia XBR-52LX900 | Samsung UN55C7000 | |
| Motion Score | ||
Viewing Effects
The viewing angle on the Samsung UN55C7000 and the Sony XBR-52LX900 was roughly the same, about 40 degrees in total for each of them. This is average for an LCD display.
| Viewing Angle Comparison | |
|---|---|
![]() |
|
| Sony Bravia XBR-52LX900: 2.66 | Samsung UN55C7000: 4.95 |
Connectivity
The Samsung UN55C7000 and the Sony XBR-52LX900 are both conservative in their connectivity options. However, Samsung’s is even more difficult to work with because each port requires its own proprietary adapter, which could prove frustrating and expensive to replace.
| Connectivity Comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sony XBR-52LX900 | Sony KDL-46HX800 | Samsung UN55C7000 | Panasonic TC-P50VT20 | |
| HDMI | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Component | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Composite | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| S-Video | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VGA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Analog Audio In | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Digital Audio Out | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Analog Audio Out | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Ethernet | Yes | None | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Memory Card Types | None | None | None | SD/SDHC/SDXC/SDXC |
| DLNA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Shop for the Sony XBR-52LX900
Latest News
& Reviews
-
23-May-2012
Best TVs for Sports
A good television is a vital purchase for any sports fan. You may be pleasantly surprised to learn that a “good for sports TV” is generally synonymous with a “good for everything TV.” However, some TVs do possess qualities beyond simple processing power that might make them better for sports. Read More...
-
18-May-2012
Samsung UN46ES6500 3D LED LCD HDTV Review
This TV has the performance and picture quality to match its good looks. Samsung’s robust Smart TV platform is just icing on the cake. Read More...
Top Rated HD Televisions
-
Also in this series

$2,599.001
Size: 59 in.Samsung PN59D7000
The Samsung PN59D7000 ($2,599 MSRP) is a stunning, high-end plasma TV fashioned by Samsung for 2011. It has 59 inches of great, 1080p picture quality, and as a second-generation plasma, it handles 3D reasonably well. Read full review
$2,599.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -
Also in this series

$1,299.002
Size: 51 in.Samsung PN51D6500
The Samsung PN51D6500 is one of the best deals for a big screen plasma TV. The performance is strong in most regards and the weakness are endemic to plasma TVs, not with this model in particular. Read full review
$1,299.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,749.993
Size: 47 in.LG 47LM6700
In addition to opinion-changing 3D images, this LG has a newly improved Smart TV menu system, and a remote that makes navigating the ever-expanding sea of content less of an odyssey. . Read full review
$1,749.99All TypesLEDOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,500.004
Size: 50 in.LG 50PZ950
This 1080p plasma television with internet and 3D capabilities is purportedly the best LG has to offer in 2011. Read full review
$1,500.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,299.005
Size: 46 in.Samsung UN46D6000
Everyone wants a Smart TV, but how smart is buying the Samsung UN46D6000 for its $1299 MSRP? With its reasonably good performance in many categories and more internet features than you can shake an e-stick at, that question might be hard to answer if it weren't for this review. Read full review
$1,299.00All TypesLCDOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes
Features
-
TelevisionInfo.com 2011 Select Awards
After testing dozens of televisions this year, the staff of TVI has made its official selections for the very best televisions of 2011. Read More...
-
3D TV, Not Ready for Prime Time
If you’ve been shopping for a new TV is the last two years, you’ve probably heard a lot of hype about 3D. As with most new technologies, customers are awash in baffling terminology and misinformation. Here’s a simple guide to walk you through the basics. Read More...
-
HDTV Streaming Content Compared
Televisions aren’t just getting their content through the coax cable anymore. Just as the internet has gradually moved towards a video-rich space—YouTube, Hulu, Vimeo, etc.—those same sorts of features are creeping into your TV sets. Like it or not, those 1000+ channels of direct cable are not enough anymore. Read More...
-
Technology Preview: Haier Completely Wireless Television
Imagine a TV with no wires. You’re talking about WiFi, right? No, we mean no wires, at all. Haier, the Chinese company better known as an appliance manufacturer, is showcasing a new technology here at CES that conducts electricity wireless to the TV, as well as streaming content. The TV is pretty far from production at this point, but it’s among the more amazing things we’ve seen at the show. Here’s an in-depth look at the technology and how it might be implemented in future products. Read More...











(add your own)