-
Introduction
-
01.Tour & Design
-
02.Blacks & Whites
-
03.Color Accuracy
-
04.Motion
-
05.Viewing Effects
-
06.Calibration
-
07.Remote Control
-
08.Connectivity
-
09.Audio & Menus
-
10.Formats & Media
-
11.Power Consumption
-
12.Vs Samsung LN46A750
-
13.Vs Sony KDL 46Z5100
-
14.VS Vizio SV470XVT
-
15.Conclusion
-
16.Series Comparison
-
17.Ratings & Specs
-
18.Comments
VIZIO SV471XVT
Previous: Page 1
Tour & DesignNext: Page 3
Color Accuracy
Blacks & Whites Summary
• The SV471XVT had bright, clear whites
• The black level was rather high, leading to muddy blacks
• Tested using DisplayMate software
Black Level (4.94)
Our first test looks at the black level, examining how dark the deepest blacks that the display can show are. We found that the SV471XVT had a slightly disappointing black level of 0.41 cd/m2, which is significantly higher than many other HDTVs. In particular, the Samsung LN46A750 had a much deeper black of 0.15 cd/m2, and the Sony KDL-46Z5100 was even lower at 0.08 cd/m2. What this means in practice is that blacks on the screen of the SV471XVT will look slightly muddy, which might affect the dramatic look of some movies.
| Black Level | |
![]() |
|
The black level is unchanged from the SV470XVT (the similar model from the previous year).
Peak Brightness (9.81)
The SV471XVT had no problems producing a bright screen, though; we measured the brightest white of this display at a tear-inducing 460.42 cd/m2, which is extremely bright and is the highest that we've seen from any display that we have tested. What this means is that you would have no problems watching this screen in the daytime; it is bright enough to be visible in most conditions, with the possible exception of the midday sun in the desert. This is also significantly brighter than the SV470XVT, so Vizio have obviously done some work behind the scenes to increase the brightness of the CCFL backlights that produce the light of this display.
| Peak Brightness | |
![]() |
|
Contrast (6.21)
The ratio between the black level and the peak brightness is the contrast ratio, which represents the range of bright to dark that the display can manage. The Vizio SV471XVT managed a contrast ratio of 1122:1, which is respectable, but not outstanding. This is due to the rather high black level, and this means that the contrast ratio is significantly less than other displays that have deeper blacks, such as the Samsung (with a ratio of 2842:1) and the Sony (4240:1).
| Contrast | |
![]() |
|
Vizio claims a contrast ratio of 50,000:1when using their DCR (Dynamic Contrast Ratio) feature, where the backlight is turned down the the screen is mostly dark, reducing the black level. However, we found that this only happened when there was a very small amount of white on screen (such as when there is a single credit on screen), so it won't make any difference in normal use. As with all HDTVs, the manufacturer's specs on things like contrast ratios have to be taken with a very large pinch of salt, as they don't reflect the real experience of what you will get. Our tests do, which is why we find significantly different results from the manufacturer's claims.
Tunnel Contrast (9.46)
Blacks and whites don't appear on the screen, so in this test we look at how well the blacks hold up as they are surrounded by different amounts of white. On some displays, the blacks become brighter as more white is on screen because some light bounces around within the screen, but this didn't seem to be a big problem with the SV417XVT; as the graph below shows, the blacks remained pretty constant as they were surrounded by more and more white. This is not unusual; very few modern HDTVs have a serious problem here.
| Tunnel Contrast | |
![]() |
|
White Falloff (9.98)
The flip side of this is how bright the whites remain as there is more and more white on screen: on some displays (particularly Plasma displays) the brightness of the whites falls off as the amount of white on screen increases. But again, the SV471XVT did not have a big problem here; the white level remained constant from just a small patch of white up to the entire screen being white. Again, we dont' typically see many problems here on most displays.
| White Falloff | |
![]() |
|
Uniformity (8.0)
If you are watching a scene of polar bear cubs frolicking in the snow, you want the snow to look the same across the screen. That doesn't happen on all displays; some have areas of the screen where the whites are paler, because of an uneven backlight or other problems. The SV471XVT had a slight issue here: in a clean white screen, we saw that the corners of the screen were significantly dimmer than the center, and that there were some slight patches of paler white at the left and right edges of the screen. With a black screen, the situation was reversed; the edges of the screen were slightly brighter. There were, however, no problems with blotches or patches of light or dark in the center of the screen, and the corner light/dark effect was a gradual fade; there were no sudden jumps from light to dark. This means that you are unlikely to notice the effect when watching a film.
Greyscale Gamma (7.57)
The greyscale gamma of a HDTV is how quickly the display goes from black to white. If it goes too quickly, images display will look too bright and washed out. If it goes too slowly, the images will look too dark. The about right spot is between 2.1 and 2.2, but the SV471XVT is a little on the high side at 2.6.
| Greyscale Gamma | |
![]() |
|
Resolution Scaling (7.38)
The SV471XVT is a 1080p screen, but it won't always get to work with this top of the line HD signal. Instead, it has to display images at lower resolutions, such as the 1080i signal that most cable and set-top boxes deliver. So, we test how well the display can deal with scaling these images to fit its 1920 by 1080 resolution screen.
480p (7.15)
480p signals come from standard definition video sources with digital outputs, such as a standard definition DVD player with a HDMI input. We found that these signals generally looked good on the this display; the text was sharp and there were only minor issues with the upscaling of the image causing . Where we noticed more of a problem is with overscanning and placement. In particular we noticed that three to four percent of the display was cut off at the edges, and that it wasn't even: more was cut off at the bottom and right side than at the top and left. This isn't unusual with a 480p signal, but the only way to avoid the overscanning is to use the Normal mode, which sets the screen to a 4:3 aspect ratio, like a standard definition display. It is worth remembering that most 480p content is meant to be slightly overscanned so this isn't a big problem, though.
720p (8.0)
With 720p content we saw none of the overscanning and alignment issues we saw with 480p content; the display switched to a full screen mode that had no overscan. If you want overscan, ou can add it by switching to the Zoom 1 (for about 3%) or Zoom 2 (for about 14%) modes. We also found that resolution was very good, with no moire patterns causing blotches or discoloration. Legibility was also very good, once again only the smallest font sizes we tested showed any problems.
1080i (7.5)
Most HD content comes in 1080i format: it is used by over the air DTV stations, and most satellite and cable systems. We found that the Vizio SV471XVT did a good job of dealing with these signals; text and complex patterns looked good, and there was no overscan. We did see some small issues, though; a complex moire pattern of alternating black and white dots on our screen had a slight greenish cast caused by the display trying to smooth out the image, which would show in video as a possible slight fringing effect on sharp edges.
| Compare the Vizio SV471XVT to other HDTVs | |||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| Samsung LN46A750 46 inches |
Sony KDL-46Z5100 46 inches |
Vizio SV470XVT 47 inches |
|||||
Shop for the VIZIO SV471XVT
Latest News
& Reviews
-
23-May-2012
Best TVs for Sports
A good television is a vital purchase for any sports fan. You may be pleasantly surprised to learn that a “good for sports TV” is generally synonymous with a “good for everything TV.” However, some TVs do possess qualities beyond simple processing power that might make them better for sports. Read More...
-
18-May-2012
Samsung UN46ES6500 3D LED LCD HDTV Review
This TV has the performance and picture quality to match its good looks. Samsung’s robust Smart TV platform is just icing on the cake. Read More...
Top Rated HD Televisions
-
Also in this series

$2,599.001
Size: 59 in.Samsung PN59D7000
The Samsung PN59D7000 ($2,599 MSRP) is a stunning, high-end plasma TV fashioned by Samsung for 2011. It has 59 inches of great, 1080p picture quality, and as a second-generation plasma, it handles 3D reasonably well. Read full review
$2,599.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -
Also in this series

$1,299.002
Size: 51 in.Samsung PN51D6500
The Samsung PN51D6500 is one of the best deals for a big screen plasma TV. The performance is strong in most regards and the weakness are endemic to plasma TVs, not with this model in particular. Read full review
$1,299.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,749.993
Size: 47 in.LG 47LM6700
In addition to opinion-changing 3D images, this LG has a newly improved Smart TV menu system, and a remote that makes navigating the ever-expanding sea of content less of an odyssey. . Read full review
$1,749.99All TypesLEDOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,500.004
Size: 50 in.LG 50PZ950
This 1080p plasma television with internet and 3D capabilities is purportedly the best LG has to offer in 2011. Read full review
$1,500.00All TypesPlasmaOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes -

$1,299.005
Size: 46 in.Samsung UN46D6000
Everyone wants a Smart TV, but how smart is buying the Samsung UN46D6000 for its $1299 MSRP? With its reasonably good performance in many categories and more internet features than you can shake an e-stick at, that question might be hard to answer if it weren't for this review. Read full review
$1,299.00All TypesLCDOnline Features (with or without)YesWith Online FeaturesNoWithout Online FeaturesYes3D and non-3D TVsYes3D TVsNoNon-3D TVsYes
Features
-
TelevisionInfo.com 2011 Select Awards
After testing dozens of televisions this year, the staff of TVI has made its official selections for the very best televisions of 2011. Read More...
-
3D TV, Not Ready for Prime Time
If you’ve been shopping for a new TV is the last two years, you’ve probably heard a lot of hype about 3D. As with most new technologies, customers are awash in baffling terminology and misinformation. Here’s a simple guide to walk you through the basics. Read More...
-
HDTV Streaming Content Compared
Televisions aren’t just getting their content through the coax cable anymore. Just as the internet has gradually moved towards a video-rich space—YouTube, Hulu, Vimeo, etc.—those same sorts of features are creeping into your TV sets. Like it or not, those 1000+ channels of direct cable are not enough anymore. Read More...
-
Technology Preview: Haier Completely Wireless Television
Imagine a TV with no wires. You’re talking about WiFi, right? No, we mean no wires, at all. Haier, the Chinese company better known as an appliance manufacturer, is showcasing a new technology here at CES that conducts electricity wireless to the TV, as well as streaming content. The TV is pretty far from production at this point, but it’s among the more amazing things we’ve seen at the show. Here’s an in-depth look at the technology and how it might be implemented in future products. Read More...









(add your own)